Sentencing Stats official Video guide to to U.S. Sentencing Commission’s Amendment 821, §4A1.1 Part B (retroactive), otherwise known as the Zero Point Offender amendment.
Zero Point Offender Amendment (Amendment 821 Part B) Video Guide
Tag: Amendment 821
Retroactive Application of Amendment 821 Part B: Zero Point Offender Infographic
Sentencing Stats official Infographic Guide to U.S. Sentencing Commission’s Amendment 821, §4A1.1 PartB (retroactive), otherwise known as the Zero Point Offender reduction.
Retroactive Application of Amendment 821 Part A: Status Points Amendment Infographic
Sentencing Stats official Infographic Guide to U.S. Sentencing Commission’s Amendment 821, §4A1.1 Part A (retroactive), otherwise known as Criminal History Status Points reduction.
Retroactive Application of Amendment 821 ZPO and Status Point Amendments
The Zero Point Offender and Status Point modifications to the Sentencing Guidelines go into effect on November 1. They are RETROACTIVE. But not everyone knows whether they may benefit from the changes or how to go about getting that benefit. Therefore, helping us get Set for Sentencing, Mark Allenbaugh, and Keith Hilzendeger to tell us
SentencingStats founder Mark Allenbaugh talks Amendment 821 / Zero Point Offender with Forbes Magazine
Forbes: What The US Sentencing Commission’s Decision Means For First Time Offenders
SentencingStats.com announces program to Assist with Retroactive Application of Amendment 821
SentencingStats.com to assist with retroactive application of Amendment 821, offering analytics, services and tools for resentencing eligible federal inmates.
Introduction to USSC Amendment 821 Part A & B: Zero Point Offender / Status Points Reductions
Policy Priorities: The Commission discussed and voted on the final policy priorities for the period of 2023-2024. These priorities would guide the Commission’s work in establishing sentencing policies and practices for federal courts. Retroactivity of Parts A and B of the 2023 Criminal History Amendment: A significant decision involved voting on the retroactivity of Parts