SentencingStats Enterprise
Scale federal sentencing intelligence across your practice.
Give attorneys across your federal defense practice access to case-specific sentencing analytics, judicial intelligence, sentencing research and expert analysis through one centrally managed platform.
Organization Dashboard
Total Members
Active
Firm-wide deployment
Case Quota Usage
In Use
Recent Activity
New Member Invitation
Attorney Account Setup
2h ago
Declaration Request
Pending review
5h ago
Usage Alert
Standard monthly allocation tracking
1d ago
Mitigation Strategy
Turn sentencing data into mitigation strategy.
Mitigation begins with the client. SentencingStats helps defense teams add another layer: grounded evidence about comparable defendants, judicial reasoning, and actual sentencing outcomes.
The goal is not to replace mitigation investigation, but to strengthen it—helping teams identify what to investigate, what to emphasize, and what to support with data.
Client-Centered Mitigation
- Client history
- Family ties
- Health / mental health
- Offense circumstances
- Rehabilitation
Sentencing Intelligence
- Comparable defendants
- Judge reasoning patterns
- Variance behavior
- Actual outcomes
- Cases to cite
CASE-SPECIFIC MITIGATION STRATEGY
What to investigate
•
What to emphasize
•
What to support with data
Federal Sentencing Intelligence
From case assessment to sentencing advocacy.
Sentence Intelligence Report
Cohort Analysis & Distribution
Comparison Set
Similarly Situated Defendants
Primary Mitigating Signal
Role Adjustment Credited
Mean
Judge Insight Dossier
Pattern from Prior Sentencings
The court tends to establish a precise Guidelines baseline and then use §3553(a) variances to address disparities or minor roles. In Griffin, the court refused to manipulate Guidelines calculations to engineer a “fair” result; in Thomas, it rejected the government’s extrapolated tax-loss figure for lack of concrete proof.
Discretion Index
Higher Variance Rate
Primary Reason Cited
Nature of Offense
Virtual Sentencing Analyst
What mitigating factors have judges in the Northern District of Florida cited when varying downward in comparable drug cases?
As it relates to this defendant, age, minor role and family circumstances were the three most frequently cited reasons for downward variances over the last five fiscal years.
Expert Declaration Excerpt
"Among similarly situated defendants, 73.2% received sentences below their applicable Guidelines range. A within-Guidelines sentence for Mr. Jefferson would fall between the 77.7th and 99.8th percentile of actual cohort sentences..."
Methodology
Documented statistical analysis
Expert Review
Included
The Enterprise Layer
One environment for the entire federal defense practice.
Enterprise brings SentencingStats together at the organizational level, giving firms a centralized way to manage access, usage, approvals and deployment across attorneys and offices.
Centralized Administration
Manage attorneys and authorized users from one environment across all firm offices.
Usage Visibility
Track case quota usage, report generation, and platform activity at the practice level.
Request & Approval Workflows
Streamline partner approvals for expert declarations, add-ons, and new personnel invitations.
Training & Support
Dedicated enterprise support and onboarding to introduce partners and associates to practical workflows.
Member Management
User
Role
Status
Attorney Account
Partner Level
Admin
Active
Attorney Account
Associate Level
User
Active
Staff Account
Litigation Support
User
Pending
Useful from the partner level to the research desk.
PL
Practice Leadership
Provide a consistent analytics capability across offices.
P&C
Partners & Counsel
Bring grounded intelligence into strategic decisions.
AS
Associates
Move quickly through comparator and judge research.
LS
Litigation Support
Organize case intelligence and reduce duplicative work.
One shared sentencing-intelligence environment across the practice.
Institutional Knowledge
Make sophisticated sentencing research repeatable.
In a large practice, sentencing expertise often resides with individual partners, attorneys or offices. SentencingStats gives the broader team a common analytical foundation—making sophisticated data research and judge-specific intelligence available wherever the next federal matter arises.
Partner expertise
Associate research
Judge knowledge
Prior case experience
SentencingStats
Shared Intelligence Layer
Any attorney
Any office
Any federal matter
Enterprise Deployment
Start with the practice group. Scale with demand.
01 — Configure
Establish participating attorneys, administrators and initial practice-group access.
→
02 — Onboard
Introduce attorneys and support personnel to the platform and core workflows.
→
03 — Expand
Broaden access and report volume as SentencingStats becomes part of the firm's practice.
Enterprise Access
Bring federal sentencing intelligence across your practice.
Enterprise plans are structured around team size, expected case and report volume, administrative requirements, onboarding and support.
Request an Enterprise Demonstration